[CQ-Contest] A dive into busting world

[Cqtestk4xs at aol.com]

Lots of dits...not a good thing.   When I used KH7XS in WPX   Randy told me 
that one year, I had the highest amount of variations to my call  in other 
logs.  Everything was sent with the computer so it wasn't a matter  of the 
fist.
 
M0OOO has the right idea!
 
K4XS/KH7XS
 
 
In a message dated 2/24/2013 1:46:58 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time,  
ct1boh at gmail.com writes:

For  those who want to dive into busting world, it very easy to collect RBN
data  available here  http://www.reversebeacon.net/raw_data/ and  list
variations of correct calls aroud a frequency.

For example 6V7V  is just a terrible call on CW. And at high speed...both
skimmer and humans  have problems.
Below is all the variations of 6V7V and the % of times it  was busted


For example checking  http://rate.pileup.ru/vlog.php?call=5U7V will give us
a hint on how busted  packet pile-ups develop.
Skimmer of someone busted 6V7V into 5U7V. All of a  sudden a pileup builds
on 6V7V side from 17:56 until 18:09 with all the  Assisted stations jumping
to the new mult without listening.
The poor  fellows at 6V7V awake to a stream of dupes, and the Assisted guys
to a  Busted call with the correspondent penaly 1+3 QSOs when log checking
is  done...



6V7V  6V7U 23.6%  6V7C 19.3%  BV7V  14.5%  6V6V 13.8%  5U7V 3.6%  6V7X 2.2%
6W7V 1.8%  D47V  1.8%  BU7V 1.5%  6V7T 1.5%  6V7A 1.5%  6V8V 1.5%   6V7Z 
1.1%
6V7S 1.1%  5V7V 1.1%  6U7V 0.7%  6V4V 0.7%   6U7U 0.7%  B47V 0.7%  6V6U 0.7%
7V7V 0.7%  6W7X 0.4%   6VZV 0.4%  6VBV 0.4%  6V7Q 0.4%  6474 0.4%  6V7  0.4%
6V7M 0.4%  6V2V 0.4%  6V7Y 0.4%  BV6V 0.4%  BV8V  0.4%  6V5V 0.4%  EV7V 0.4%
6V7VQ 0.4%  6V 0.4%  6V7W  0.4%



-- 
José Nunes
CONTEST CT1BOH -  http://www.qsl.net/ct1boh
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest