[CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted

Randy Thompson K5ZD k5zd at charter.net
Tue Jan 29 12:45:18 EST 2013


Just for discussion purposes, how about if I give you 5000 to 8000 logs.
Then how easy is it?

Randy, K5ZD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Joe
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:36 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
> 
> It should be easy - MM, M2, MS, SOHP, SOHP(A), SOLP, SOLP(A), QRP, QRP(A)
> - What the heck is so hard about that?  Anyone?
> 
> AGREED 100%
> 
> Joe WB9SBD
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 1/28/2013 8:29 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
> > If contest committees are spending time to check on the use of
> > assisted in the non-assisted class, then the logical conclusion is
> > that it would give the cheater an advantage.  Otherwise why bother.
> > So, it is clear that it has an effect on the outcome.  And it has had
> > an effect on the outcome.in at least one recent CQWW, the HP(A)
> > category outscored the HP category.  I am quite sure it wasn't the
> first time.
> >
> >
> >
> > So why is this topic so suddenly being floated by some very familiar
> > names in the contest circles?  Fess up folks.
> >
> >
> >
> > Both categories are big and popular in all power categories.  Why is
> > there a need to change it?
> >
> >
> >
> > I completely agree with an early part of this thread that every
> > contest should have an assisted category and to not force assisted
> > operators into the Multi-Single category just for using packet or
> > skimmer.  That is as unfair as forcing single ops to compete with
> > operators with global assistance.
> >
> >
> >
> > It should be easy - MM, M2, MS, SOHP, SOHP(A), SOLP, SOLP(A), QRP,
> > QRP(A)  - What the heck is so hard about that?  Anyone?
> >
> >
> >
> > Ed  N1UR
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list