[CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted

[Luc Moreira]

I've been seen cheaters laughing on my face every year. I can live
with that, but If Contest Sponsors begin to punish clean guys by
mistake I wont be around on this game any more.

If you merge HP+HP(A) then you are punishing honest guys that choose
to work hard using his VFO or his MOUSE to get better score.

Problem is 'dirty guys' that work hard to deceive me and you on how
much power output or how many Ops they used on the contest.

So, I support careful log checking process and additional
investigation did by sponsor AND by community. The turn point will be
when spotted cheaters gonna be punished despite how famous, rich, old
(I mean traditional), or powerful they are.
73, Luc
__
PW7T Team member
WRTC.2006 Brazilian Referee
WRTC.2010 Brazilian Team Leader
PY8AZT (also PT7AG, R37U, ZY7C, PX8C, ZZ8Z)
LABRE, ARRL, CWJF & Fortaleza DX Group Member




2013/1/29 Randy Thompson K5ZD <k5zd at charter.net>:
> Just for discussion purposes, how about if I give you 5000 to 8000 logs.
> Then how easy is it?
>
> Randy, K5ZD
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>> Joe
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:36 PM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-assisted & Assisted
>>
>> It should be easy - MM, M2, MS, SOHP, SOHP(A), SOLP, SOLP(A), QRP, QRP(A)
>> - What the heck is so hard about that?  Anyone?
>>
>> AGREED 100%
>>
>> Joe WB9SBD
>> Sig
>> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
>> Idle Tyme
>> Idle-Tyme.com
>> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>> On 1/28/2013 8:29 PM, Edward Sawyer wrote:
>> > If contest committees are spending time to check on the use of
>> > assisted in the non-assisted class, then the logical conclusion is
>> > that it would give the cheater an advantage.  Otherwise why bother.
>> > So, it is clear that it has an effect on the outcome.  And it has had
>> > an effect on the outcome.in at least one recent CQWW, the HP(A)
>> > category outscored the HP category.  I am quite sure it wasn't the
>> first time.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > So why is this topic so suddenly being floated by some very familiar
>> > names in the contest circles?  Fess up folks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Both categories are big and popular in all power categories.  Why is
>> > there a need to change it?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I completely agree with an early part of this thread that every
>> > contest should have an assisted category and to not force assisted
>> > operators into the Multi-Single category just for using packet or
>> > skimmer.  That is as unfair as forcing single ops to compete with
>> > operators with global assistance.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > It should be easy - MM, M2, MS, SOHP, SOHP(A), SOLP, SOLP(A), QRP,
>> > QRP(A)  - What the heck is so hard about that?  Anyone?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Ed  N1UR
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CQ-Contest mailing list
>> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest