[CQ-Contest] IARU HQ Callsigns

[Ricardo Navarrete]

Hi all,
The rules are clear , same call in the same band
So

160 Ssb xx0hq
160 cw xx0hq
80 ssb xx1hq
80 cw xx1hq
And so on.......

if you don't follow this rule, you can be disqualified.

Good luck !

Sent from my Samsung
El 09/07/2013 14:08, "rin JG1VGX" <jg1vgx at jarl.com> escribió:

> If the interpretation by Tree is true, Japan is also violating the
> rule for a number of years, this year inclusive, and have never been
> notified.
>
> Here is this year's list of 8NxHQ (mult=JARL)
>
> 160 CW - 8N1HQ
> 160 SSB - no QRV
> 80 CW - 8N4HQ
> 75 SSB - no QRV (perhaps)
> 40 CW - 8N4HQ
> 40 SSB - 8N4HQ
> 20 CW - 8N8HQ
> 20 SSB - 8N1HQ
> 15 CW - 8N1HQ
> 15 SSB - 8N1HQ
> 10 CW - 8N1HQ
> 10 SSB - 8N4HQ
>
> Too late to change this for us I'm afraid.
>
> For more historical details, see below:
> http://www.motobayashi.net/8j-station/hq.html
> (Please disregard Japanese characters and say NO to install fonts if asked)
>
> 73 rin JG1VGX
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Tree <tree at kkn.net> wrote:
> >
> > Saw this recently posted:
> >
> >> The Radio Club Argentino LU4AA and the LUCG (LU Contest Group) put
> together
> >> a team for the upcoming IARU HF Championship next weekend and several
> >> stations will be giving out the RCA multiplier.
> >>
> >> Stations as follows - hosts in parenthesis - :
> >>
> >> 10 SSB: LR1D
> >> 10 CW LR2H
> >> 15 SSB LR0H
> >> 15 CW LR0F
> >
> > ...
> >
> > This appears to conflict with the following rule for the IARU contest:
> >
> > "4.3.3. Only one HQ station callsign per member society per frequency
> band is
> > permitted."
> >
> > The rules can be found here: http://www.arrl.org/iaru-hf-championship
> >
> > I would interpret a "frequency band" as being all of 10 meters for
> example.
> >
> > This is likely the case because of the way the multiplier rule is worded:
> >
> > "Multipliers: The total number of ITU zones plus IARU member society HQ
> > stations worked on each band (not mode)."
> >
> > In the case above - I am sure the intent of the rules would not have been
> > to count LR1D and LR2H as two multpliers in the contest.
> >
> > Tree N6TR
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> --
> 73 de rin JG1VGX
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>