[CQ-Contest] Error free RBN

[Barry]

How would it filter out commonly miscopied calls such as LW3LPL and 
JH3CTQ (the latter being human error)?
Barry W2UP

On 7/16/2013 10:41, Hal Kennedy wrote:
> I may be by myself all alone out in the woods with this opinion, but I 
> like the RBN having errors.  The "image problem" is probably something 
> worth filtering out to the degree technically possible, but the rest?  
> I like the errors.
>
> As a usually-assisted operator, one of my discriminators, just as in 
> unassisted, is experience.  I know A LOT of the calls by heart, I can 
> do "off-by-one" in my head.  I know how strong particular stations and 
> stations in general should be at any given hour, and who has clix, who 
> goes slow and who goes fast, and I also know how RBN errors tend to 
> look in real-time and over time.  This allows me to mentally filter 
> the errors out.
>
> I'd like to continue to see operators have to actually copy the 
> callsign and exchange to be sure, and to keep their UBN under control 
> - which goes away with error-free data.  I like the errors, they 
> benefit those who have put in the work and and are willing to copy it 
> all, when others can't or won't.  I also think (or hope?) the errors 
> encourage others to pick up their game.
>
> With the best of intentions....
>
> 73,
> Hal
> N4GG
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>