[CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...
kzerohb at gmail.com
Thu Jun 6 16:57:13 EDT 2013
See the rules......
A. Everything not specifically allowed in these rules is
Contesting is now serious business, with inspectors, pre-nuptial
declarations, and double penalties for unskilled operators.
de Hans, K0HB
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 8:18 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...
Fun and contesting....do those terms still mix? :)
On 6/6/2013 12:26 PM, Gerry Hull wrote:
> Agreed, Ed. In the end, It doesn't matter one hill of beans..
> I'll ask the FD chairman -- but I'm simply a band captain trying to figure
> out what I want to do.
> The club has been 4A for years -- they probably don't want to change now.
> Until this rule this year, it would not have been a no-brainer decision.
> So, we will either change categories or coordinate the number of on-air
> TX's (as N4OGA suggested), or I'll just not configure it.
> It's still going to be a lot of fun -- as it always is.
> 73, Gerry W1VE
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Edward Sawyer
> <SawyerEd at earthlink.net>wrote:
>> Gerry, Just call it a 5A and be done with it. Then you can still
>> demonstrate and you are not trying to "intentionally claim fewer
>> transmitters". After all.its not a contest. What does it matter?
>> Ed N1UR
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest