[CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?

[Ron Notarius W3WN]

Well Bill, at the very least, when the survey results are compiled and
released... and more importantly, if and when any changes as a result of the
survey are implemented... come right out and tell us who the survey was
limited to.

It is frustrating to read or hear about a change as a result of an alleged
survey, and then be told "sorry, you SHOULD HAVE KNOWN, better luck next
time" with no further explanation.  And that's happened more than once in
the recent past.

73

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Cqtestk4xs at aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2013 8:48 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?

How are they supposed to know you operated in a contest and you want to  
submit your opinions if you don't send in a log?  Only way this could be
done 
is to check every call in the log data base and then manually look up each  
guy's email address and send him an email.  Pretty time intensive.
 
I'm sure if you contacted the boys at CQ and told them you wanted to submit 
 your comments they would be glad to accept them.
 
73 Bill K4XS/KH7XS
 
 
In a message dated 3/10/2013 11:10:35 A.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,  
wn3vaw at verizon.net writes:

I  see.  Thanks Barry.

There are those of use who operate in the  contest, but do not submit logs
for any of a variety of reasons.   

I guess our opinions aren't important then.  

Pity.   This used to be one of my favorite contests,  too.

/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest