[CQ-Contest] When is speed not speedy?
Joe
nss at mwt.net
Thu May 30 20:13:29 EDT 2013
other than the zero and nine if the person uses cut numbers they loose
my contact. I hate them, so just don't work anyone using them.
Or maybe I will next time just keep asking for repeats until i get
actual numbers.
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 5/30/2013 5:55 PM, Georgek5kg at aol.com wrote:
> John,
>
> The worst example of a serial number using cut numbers happened to me twice
> in WPX. I worked two different stations that sent four digit serial
> numbers ending in 50. Using a cut number for the "zero", the two different
> stations sent -- at a very high speed -- dit dit dit dit dit dah. I copied
> this as a 4, but I knew instinctively that something didn't feel right
> because of the extra space before the ending dah. I had to ask for many repeats
> before I finally got it!
>
> BTW, I can easily copy something north of 40 wpm, so this was not a case
> where the speed was over my head. What was over my head was the cut number
> for the "zero" a number 5.
>
> My impression at the time was that these speed demon whiz kids using their
> fancy-schmancy cut numbers had just wasted a bunch of my time!
>
> 73, Geo...
>
> George Wagner, K5KG
> Sarasota, FL
> 941-400-1960 cell
>
>
> In a message dated 5/30/2013 6:29:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> john at kk9a.com writes:
>
> I think if you are calling CQ at 20 wpm people should answer you at that
> speed. If they call you at a much higher speed it is just rude. If you
> call someone, they assume that you were already able to copy their
> callsign and that you would be able to copy the report and recognize your
> callsign at their speed. You probably already heard the report that they
> gave to the station before you so you should already have some idea what
> to expect. I think it is unrealistic to expect a running station to match
> the speed of every caller.
>
> I also do not like cut numbers when I am expecting a serial number,
> especially when it is sent as a mixture of real numbers and cut ones. Many
> logging programs will make the conversion if you type the appropriate
> letter.
>
> John, P40A last weekend
>
>
>
> To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject:[CQ-Contest] When is speed not speedy?
> From: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw at gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 19:35:27 +0700
>
> When is high speed CW not speedy?
> Answer, when sending to me well beyond my SENDING SPEED of 20 WPM. I
> worked the whole contest at 20wpm sending and rcving (I can do that speed
> well and remember when it was considered fast?), lots as H&P so the other
> station already knew my speed because I called him at 20.
>
> He sends four numeral S.N. at 40wpm, so I have to ask for THREE repeats,
> one for each of the last three numerals. If, like good ops of old, he just
> came down to 20, no repeats and no delays and no cursing me under his
> breath.
>
> I guess some programs are difficult to adjust speed or maybe "real"
> contesters are just arrogant??? My radios have a speed knob right on
> front.
>
> I bet that without RBN and code readers, the speed demons would not be able
> to run like that. BTW, by sending 5NN at 70wpm followed by the SN at 40
> keeps even the smartest code readers missing the first few numbers as it
> re-times from 70 down to 40.
>
> I copied the "cut numbers" as letters and plan to send in a log that way.
> When will ops begin to use cut numbers inside their call signs too?... I
> used E2E, and guess I could have signed EAE.
> Also, when my friend can win his category for Asia and not know code,
> really, something is wrong with contesting and respect for and satisfaction
> with human achievement.
>
> Oh, have my smart phone tell me when the next contest is over and how my
> new, 80wpm, fully automated station did in scores. 73,
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list