[CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?
Joe
nss at mwt.net
Wed Nov 27 17:35:31 EST 2013
And even us guys that have no chance of winning, but follow the rules..
does matter to us.
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 11/27/2013 3:38 PM, Cqtestk4xs at aol.com wrote:
> Without some sort of penalty why not guess and/or make up "uniques". Only
> the Qs that they don't like are the ones you lose. I don't know if the
> prior or subsequent QSO should be lost, but there needs to be some kind of
> penalty for busted Qs. No penalty is so 2000s.
>
> For the serious guys it DOES matter.
>
> Bill K4XS
>
>
> In a message dated 11/27/2013 5:01:28 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
> kzerohb at gmail.com writes:
>
> Joe, I think you're taking this game a little too seriously.
>
> Screw up a QSO, you lose that QSO, but punishment in the form of
> additional
> score reduction is so 1940's.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
> "Just a boy and his radio"™
> --
>
>
>
>> I would like to see the QSO's before and after also be removed.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list