[CQ-Contest] WW Committee feared that some of the non-assisted hotshots would take the opportunity to drop down to the 24-hour category for the sake of an easy

Richard F DiDonna NN3W richnn3w at verizon.net
Wed Oct 23 07:27:41 EDT 2013


I cant blame the Committee.  This week I have a campout outing.  
Potentially I could have switched to the 24 hour category and probably 
have done rather well.

73 Rich NN3W

On 10/22/2013 7:04 PM, Rick Tavan N6XI wrote:
> It's an interesting addition. Since it's an overlay, can ops do 24 hours
> under the "classic" rules and then continue on SO2R and/or Assisted for the
> remainder of a "modern" entry?
>
> /Rick
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr at contesting.com>wrote:
>
>> Bravo, Steve!
>>
>> I would just add one point.  I've been told that the 1 radio no spotting
>> caveats were added because some folks on the CQ Committee were concerned
>> that non-assisted hot-shots would drop down to the 24-hour overlay unless
>> these things were outlawed.  I frankly doubt this, particularly with
>> respect to the assisted/non-assisted angle.  However, instead of sitting on
>> the sidelines, it is important that supporters of the 24-hour category
>> enter it this year, so that we can credibly make the argument for loosening
>> that restriction next time.
>>
>> To encourage participation, I have funded a Classic overlay/World top
>> score plaque for 2013.  It doesn't show up on the web site yet, but it *is*
>> funded, and I'm sure they'll fix that before the contest.  This is your
>> chance for some nice hardwood.
>>
>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
>> http://reversebeacon.net,
>> blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
>> For spots, please go to your favorite
>> ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
>>
>> On 10/22/2013 9:26 AM, Steve London wrote:
>>
>>> And a special reminder....
>>>
>>> There is a new overlay entry category - CLASSIC
>>>
>>> The principle features are:
>>>
>>> - 24 hours
>>> - 1 radio
>>> - No DX spotting
>>>
>>> See the rules for more details.
>>>
>>> Many CQ-Contest readers have been asking for this category. Hope you will
>>> be taking advantage of it.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Steve, N2IC
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/22/2013 05:20 AM, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:
>>>
>>>> CQ WW SSB is less than 4 days away!  Let's all hope conditions continue
>>>> to
>>>> be as good as they have been recently.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Reminder that the rules have changed for 2013.  Please take a moment to
>>>> read
>>>> over them at http://www.cqww.com/rules.htm
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am receiving many questions.  Take some time and read through the
>>>> Frequently Asked Questions at http://www.cqww.com/rules_faq.**htm<http://www.cqww.com/rules_faq.htm>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The FAQ page provides some additional explanation of the rules and
>>>> clarifications that explain how the CQWW Contest Committee will judge the
>>>> logs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good luck to everyone in the contest!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Randy Thompson, K5ZD
>>>> Director - CQ WW DX Contest
>>>>
>>>> email: k5zd at cqww.com
>>>> web:<http://www.cqww.com/> www.cqww.com
>>>>
>>>> Facebook:<http://www.facebook.**com/cqwwdx<http://www.facebook.com/cqwwdx>>
>>>> www.facebook.com/cqwwdx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>>>>
>>>>   ______________________________**_________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>>>
>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>>
>
>



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list