[CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R

[Tom Haavisto]

If he ain't having fun, he is definitely in the wrong class!!


Tom - VE3CX



On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com> wrote:

> However, KU7Y is concerned that they can't afford a second radio.
>
> If they can't afford a second radio, it is hardly likely that they can
> afford the antennas needed to win a competitive class in a major contest.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
>
> On 12/02/2014 12:02 PM, john at kk9a.com wrote:
>
>> Do not underestimate what can be done with a single radio. Many stations
>> use a single radio and have won their category.
>>
>> John KK9A - P40A
>>
>>
>> To:     <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>> Subject:        [CQ-Contest] SO1R vs.: SO2R
>> From:   "KU7Y" <ku7y.cw at gmail.com>
>> Date:   Tue, 2 Dec 2014 07:48:39 -0800
>>
>> I think SO2R and SO1R should be in different classes.
>>
>> I admire the skills those SO2R operators have and appreciate the
>> investment
>> they have made both in equipment and in the time needed to learn to this.
>>
>> But what chance does anyone have of winning their class when all they have
>> and
>> can afford is one radio?
>>
>> OTOH, I have no idea how much extra work it would be for the contest
>> sponsors
>> to add yet another class.
>>
>> OK, back in my hole,
>>
>> Ron, KU7Y
>> Arizona Outlaws Contest Club
>> Northern California Contest Club
>> ku7y at qsl.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> .
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>