[CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?

[Trent Sampson]

Its all part of the world of contesting - 
When a single op is happy to put someone else in the chair while he rests and still enters the log as SOAB - if that keeps him happy then the rest of us just grin and bear it...the same with assisted vs unassisted, HP vs Ubber HP,
With reference to the RBN - Data analysis would show it up pretty easily but there is still a chance that they are just a good SO2R operator. 
At the end of the day we still need to trust the word of the fellow operator..if we cant, we either ignore it or take up bowling. 
Cheers - Hope to hear you all on air this weekend from VK4KW







> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 13:57:58 -0600
> From: ve5zx at hotmail.com
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] No advantage to assisted?
> 
> 
> > Most easy with the busted calls in unassisted logs for example
> 
> With the improving accuracy of RBN spots (Thanks Pete and others) soon 
> one will have to look for increased accuracy not a decreased accuracy as 
> an indicator of cluster use.
> 
> Perhaps we are already there.  Does anyone know?
> 
> Syl - VE5ZX
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest