[CQ-Contest] Unassisted, SK?
Radio K0HB
kzerohb at gmail.com
Sun Dec 14 10:02:19 EST 2014
Really? Applaud?
You applaud the end of solo contesting? That "just a boy and his radio" cannot continue to independently compete as a category?
Why does that pending extinction draw your enthusiastic approval?
73, de Hans, K0HB/K7
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Steve Lott <lottsphoto at gmail.com> wrote:
> I applaud their change !
> cheers!
> steve
> KG5VK
> http://www.KG5VK.com
> My Ham Radio Friends
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> WRTC qualification should not be about social engineering and "incentive
>> for change". It should be about "selecting the most skilled".
>>
>>
>> 73, de Hans, K0HB/K7
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Oliver Sweningsen <w6nv at pacbell.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Some have said that in the past, the 'best' operators 'wanted' to
>> compete in
>> > the unassisted category.
>> >
>> > The WRTC qualification process will provide the incentive for change.
>> Two
>> > Bob Dylan quotes come to mind: "Yesterday's just a memory, tomorrow is
>> never
>> > what it's supposed to be." And, "You don't need a weatherman to know
>> which
>> > way the wind blows."
>> >
>> > Check the scores and, follow the leader(s).
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CQ-Contest mailing list
>> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list