[CQ-Contest] Need clarification from DL1MGB

[4O3A]

Sinisa/David,

If it is a true, than organizer missed the essence of WRTC.

I still hope it could be a mistake, or unclear rules. Otherwise, it's 
senseless and for some reason organizer wants to push all of us to 
compete as assisted, qualifying for pure unassisted event as WRTC is.

If it's mistake, super. If don't, I would like to hear from Chris 
explanation for such decision?

I really respect effort of DL guys for taking WRTC in Germany. Also I 
fully respect their right to change the rules. But, some decisions are 
at least strange.

Again, I appeal to organizers to reconsider:

 1. Number of contests for qualifying to maximum - 8 (eight). It will
    give more chance to simpler stations and will make qualifications
    more attractive. Does it has a sense if we, more or less, already
    know who will be qualified, and it depends only on how large station
    is? I belong to those who are privileged, but I do not like it at all.
 2. To count contests in season 2017, giving to us enough of time, as we
    all have family, business and private life.
 3. Not to change numbers of teams in EU areas, and to keep it as it was
    before. Needless to make more comments on how it is now in rules.
 4. To make visible difference between Unassisted/Assisted, giving 0,9
    to assisted, for example
 5. To keep MS scores weightiness same as SOAB, as it was before. With
    factor 0,9 we will push MS contesting by side in next two years. MS
    is much more closer to WRTC principle, than SOAB Assisted. Thanks to
    same weighting factor of SOAB and MS in previous qualification
    period for WRTC in USA, we have had very attractive and intensive MS
    fighting in EU and USA, and some continental records are increased
    significantly.

IMHO all five objections should be considered very seriously
73
Ranko







On 12/16/2014 5:01 PM, David Siddall wrote:
> LOL.  It was "clear" to me until I saw Sinisa's answer.  My answer is that,
> for the stated scenario, assisted gets 1000 points and unassisted gets 714
> points.   73,  Dave K3ZJ
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:14 AM, shristov <shristov at ptt.rs> wrote:
>> 4O3A <4o3a at t-com.me> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> *Assisted scores are compared against Unassisted scores.
>>> If someone make in CQWW as unassisted - 10 points
>>> Another guy make in same contest as assisted - 14 points
>>> What are final scores for WRTC qualification?
>>
>> Rules are very clear on this.
>>
>> Assuming top unassisted score of 10 points,
>> unassisted guy gets 1000, and assisted guy gets 1400.
>>
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Sinisa  YT1NT
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4794 / Virus Database: 4235/8746 - Release Date: 12/16/14
>
>