[CQ-Contest] Too Much 'Assistance'?

Charlie Gallo Charlie at TheGallos.com
Thu Feb 20 12:56:43 EST 2014

There is actually a 3rd option (Not MY opionion, but I know it well)

"Spirt" and "Intent" don't matter, only the RULES matter, and if you can find a loophole, go for it (Hey, we can say that SO2R is really a violation of the intent of "single" - I won't but...)

To quote Junior Johnson (NASCAR Racer, Owner, car designer - guy who first used drafting...)
"If you ain't cheatin, you ain't tryin" 

There are LOTS of grey areas in rules.  I cam across one in a Robotics competition we just finished building for.  Rules say 1/4" pneumatic tube, max ID of .188 (they supply the exact tubing).  They say NOTHING about running pieces in parallel.  We decided against that design, because if they ruled against it at tech inspection, we'd have been dead - BTW the cylinders and air supply were 1/8 pipe, so we could have put in a Tee, and doubled our air flow...

On 2/20/2014 Tony Brock-Fisher wrote:

>  Some will agree it 
> clearly violates the spirit and intent of the rules if not the letter;
> others will argue it's the same as what has been permitted and condoned
> for years

73 de KG2V - Charles Gallo
Quality Custom Machine-shop work for the radio amateur (sm)

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list