[CQ-Contest] NAQP (A) class
Pete Smith N4ZR
n4zr at contesting.com
Sun Jan 12 16:18:13 EST 2014
I agree with your advocacy of an assisted class, Bill, but it's not just
Skimmers. Any spottingproduces the same phenomenon. I suspect that
many people get on during NAQP and use spots, not because they are
cheating but because they use the occasion to finish multi-band WAS
awards. In the past, I have run power in NAQP and submitted Checklogs,
simply lookingfor "rate fun."
Also, making spots per se is not illegal - you could turn on the "Spot
all S&P QSOs" function in N1MM Logger, and so long as you "SEt NOdx" at
the cluster, it is perfectly legal, because you are *receiving* no
assistance.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 1/12/2014 1:02 PM, ko7ss at yahoo.com wrote:
> IMHO, there really should be an (A) class in NAQP! Skimmers are being used, many times
> yesterday I had groups of 3-5 stations call in absolutely zero-beat. What's the point in making
> (A) stations enter as M/2? Why would they bother sending in a log?
>
> 73, Bill KO7AA
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list