[CQ-Contest] Why I ignore "NA EU" etc

PA5MW, Mark pa5mw at home.nl
Tue Jan 28 14:06:47 EST 2014


Oh there is a few good reasons here from EU why some refuse to respond 
to these 'discussions';

- Our critical input often does not appear here
- Whatever diplomacy used, as soon as we seem to *touch someones 
personal toy-preference* we get bad mouthed by US hams, describing our 
view as the worst on the planet, calling us names etc.  (that kind of 
content is NOT moderated by the way)
- Similar experiences was confirmed by others to me off-line

For me, I was able to put things back in sync positively with those via 
direct mail; there is no fulfillment in a maintaining  a dispute, let 
alone calling names, ever.
However, I do refrain from entering discussions where those few here who 
rule it all and are not willing to accept there are hams with a 
different opinion. Live and let live.

Rather go contesting.
Enjoyed a GREAT 160m CW  weekend.
Hope you all enjoyed it too.
73 Mark, PA5MW

On 27-1-2014 19:41, David Gilbert wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why every active contest station outside North 
> America and Europe doesn't regularly post their operating 
> preferences/practices/biases to this reflector like Charlie does? Are 
> they just too lazy or is there some other reason why Charlie seems to 
> be the only one?
>
> Dave   AB7E
>



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list