[CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
hankkier at aol.com
hankkier at aol.com
Wed Jan 29 20:38:43 EST 2014
it's not going to matter if CQ doesn't resume delivering the magazine, since no one will know any of the rule changes (if any).
now 2 full months behind delivery schedule. staff I've talked to is silent on what's going on but seem very uneasy. doesn't look very good for CQ continuing right now...hope I'm wrong because they are really the backbone of dxing and contesting.
Hank KF2O
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Sidarau <vs.lists at gmail.com>
To: cq-contest <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wed, Jan 29, 2014 7:39 pm
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
Gents,
Sorry, I did not realize, the 2014 rules are not at the web site yet.
Therefore please disregard my previous message and wait for an official
publication.
73,
Vlad VE3IAE
--
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vladimir Sidarau" <vs.lists at gmail.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 3:43 PM
Subject: CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
> Perhaps I just have not seen it before.
>
> Reading the CQ WPX Rules 2014:
>
> qt
> --
>
> XII. A. Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Examples of unsportsmanlike conduct
> include, but are not limited to:
> ...
> 6. Running stations making more than 3 contacts without sending their
> callsign.
>
> unqt
> ---
>
> Thanks to the CQ WPX Contest Commitee.
>
> 73,
>
> Vlad VE3IAE
>
> --
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list