[CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
Doug Smith W9WI
dougw9wi at gmail.com
Fri Jan 31 10:12:32 EST 2014
On 01/30/2014 11:53 PM, Yuri wrote:
> It's amazing that some folks completely forget that this is a CONTEST
> (competition).
> Some people try to COMPETE and WIN. That's why they try to maximize the
> number of contacts (aka QSOs).
>
> If you don't want to wait 30 seconds to hear the other station's ID,
> then just find clear frequency, call CQ yourself and make those 2-3 or
> whatever Q's.
I can't find a clear frequency because they're all occupied by stations
I can't work because I have no idea what their callsigns are:)
Seriously, yes, it's a contest. BOTH participants in a contest QSO are
trying to COMPETE and WIN.
Expecting the S&P operator to waste 30 seconds doing nothing waiting for
the run operator to ID is to suggest the S&P operator's time is not
valuable - that he is not entitled to COMPETE and WIN.
I note the Sprint contests have required ID with every QSO from the
beginning. At least here in the U.S. these contests are recognized as
*the* test of operator ability. Nobody is suggesting this rule be
deleted. IMHO its addition to the WPX is a welcome change.
==
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN EM66
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list