[CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules
kzerohb at gmail.com
Mon Jun 23 21:51:56 EDT 2014
Hey, guys hold the conversation for 10 minutes while I go get some popcorn
and a six-pack.
OK, I'm back. Go ahead.
From: Jim Forsyth
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 11:15 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules
I've got a better idea. How about we stick with the universal rule that
applies to any type of contest: Each competitor adopts a strategy that
he hopes will maximize HIS OWN score.
Once you try to force a competitor to adopt a strategy to boost his
competitors score it ceases to be a contest.
On 6/23/2014 10:48 AM, Carol Richards wrote:
> While it is a step in the right direction, ID'ing in a timely manner; i.e
> 1 minute, it is too subjective and will easily be violated. Please
> consider a more definitive approach....something like: id'ing must be done
> at least every 3-5 qsos. Most good ops ID more often than that. Even if a
> station is running at 5 qsos/minute, waiting for the call of a station
> will not cause the listener that much of a loss of valuable time.
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest