[CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules

Radio K0HB kzerohb at gmail.com
Mon Jun 23 21:51:56 EDT 2014


Hey, guys hold the conversation for 10 minutes while I go get some popcorn 
and a six-pack.

======

OK, I'm back.  Go ahead.






-----Original Message----- 
From: Jim Forsyth
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 11:15 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules

I've got a better idea. How about we stick with the universal rule that
applies to any type of contest: Each competitor adopts a strategy that
he hopes will maximize HIS OWN score.

Once you try to force a competitor to adopt a strategy to boost his
competitors score it ceases to be a contest.

Jim, AF6O


On 6/23/2014 10:48 AM, Carol Richards wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While it is a step in the right direction, ID'ing in a timely manner; i.e 
> 1 minute, it is too subjective and will easily be violated. Please 
> consider a more definitive approach....something like: id'ing must be done 
> at least every 3-5 qsos. Most good ops ID more often than that. Even if a 
> station is running at 5 qsos/minute, waiting for the call of a station 
> will not cause the listener that much of a loss of valuable time.
>
>
> Carol
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list