[CQ-Contest] PENALTY for dirty rigs (was handicap)
Paul O'Kane
pokane at ei5di.com
Mon Oct 13 10:48:03 EDT 2014
On 13/10/2014 12:14, kr2q at optimum.net wrote:
> CQWW seems to have a lot more in mind than a "handicap." By the way, AFAI, in sports,
> a handicap can mean that you get some sort of advantage, not a penalty.
>
> Please see the link below, noting especially item A.5. (see text below
<snip>
> 5. Signals with excessive bandwidth (e.g., splatter, clicks) or harmonics on other bands.
With this in mind, I spent some time searching for
stations with excessive bandwidth during the 2013
CQWW CW contest - my K3/P3 combination enables
visible and measurable confirmation of audible
key clicks.
I noted over 300 such "transgressions", some from
VERY well-known stations, and sent a detailed
log (with precise times and frequencies) to the
contest sponsor. We know they have access to
recordings from a network of SDRs.
My report was acknowledged promptly, saying it
would be passed to the judging team. The result,
11 weeks later in mid-February 2014, was
"We took a listen to these with the SDR.
Unfortunately the SDRs do not have great
antennas so we can hear the stations, but
not the key clicks you mention."
Apparently, not a single instance of key clicks
was verifiable and no action was taken. It seems
there is neither the ability nor the resolve to
to enforce Rule A.5.
73,
Paul EI5DI
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list