[CQ-Contest] ONE radio, two operators??

[Charles Harpole]

Tnx KR2Q....  Now I remember why I thot the Multi One category is dumb.  I
see that it does give the second op something to do in addition to sleep,
but really kills off the idea of ONE op and ONE radio to which the category
NAME implies.   The rule that I have finally paid attention to appears to
be a cheap way for second level pistols to APPEAR to compete with the first
level pistols.  More and more as I reawaken to the contest rules I
understand why the whole things are designed by big pistol ops and why many
other operators opt out of contesting.  I also refer to rules which make
huge Asia equal to EU.

Baloney, 73, Charly

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:40 PM, <kr2q at optimum.net> wrote:

> Charly,
>
> Yes, you have read it correctly.  It has been this way for over 3 decades.
>
> See my article in CQ from August 1981, where M/S is elaborated.
> It was that way even before my article.  This article is a bit dated, so
> for
> up to date information, see the 2 links below.
>
> See: http://www.cqww.com/rules.htm
>
> Also see the Multi-Single FAQ: http://www.cqww.com/rules_faq.htm
> Scroll about half way down the above cited page.
>
> GL!
>
> de Doug KR2Q
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
Charly, HS0ZCW