[CQ-Contest] ONE radio, two operators??

[Oliver Dröse]

Why not an Overlay category for "true" M/S like there is for SO Classic? 
Might be a worthwhile idea without needing to change the rules 
themselves, impact on records, a.s.o.

73, Olli - DH8BQA

Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de


Am 26.10.2014 03:29, schrieb Paul Stoetzer:
> I do wish there were a category for multiple operators taking shifts
> operating a single radio. I have no problem with the M/S category, but it'd
> be nice to have a "true" M/S category too.
>
> 73,
>
> Paul, N8HM
>
> On Friday, October 24, 2014, <k2qmf at juno.com> wrote:
>
>> Charlie K4VUD,
>>
>> DUMD is in the eyes of the beholder!
>>
>> Maybe us "second level pistols" enjoy operating M/S.
>> I'm sorry that you don't see the enjoyment in contesting!
>> See you on the WARC bands some day!  Don't hold your breath...
>>
>> Swiss cheese, 73, Sal
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:57:52 +0700 Charles Harpole <hs0zcw at gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>>
>> writes:
>>> Tnx KR2Q....  Now I remember why I thot the Multi One category is
>>> dumb.  I
>>> see that it does give the second op something to do in addition to
>>> sleep,
>>> but really kills off the idea of ONE op and ONE radio to which the
>>> category
>>> NAME implies.   The rule that I have finally paid attention to
>>> appears to
>>> be a cheap way for second level pistols to APPEAR to compete with
>>> the first
>>> level pistols.  More and more as I reawaken to the contest rules I
>>> understand why the whole things are designed by big pistol ops and
>>> why many
>>> other operators opt out of contesting.  I also refer to rules which
>>> make
>>> huge Asia equal to EU.
>>>
>>> Baloney, 73, Charly
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:40 PM, <kr2q at optimum.net <javascript:;>>
>> wrote:
>>>> Charly,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you have read it correctly.  It has been this way for over 3
>>> decades.
>>>> See my article in CQ from August 1981, where M/S is elaborated.
>>>> It was that way even before my article.  This article is a bit
>>> dated, so
>>>> for
>>>> up to date information, see the 2 links below.
>>>>
>>>> See: http://www.cqww.com/rules.htm
>>>>
>>>> Also see the Multi-Single FAQ: http://www.cqww.com/rules_faq.htm
>>>> Scroll about half way down the above cited page.
>>>>
>>>> GL!
>>>>
>>>> de Doug KR2Q
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com <javascript:;>
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Charly, HS0ZCW
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com <javascript:;>
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> Map Your Flood Risk
>> Find Floodplan Maps, Facts, FAQs, Your Flood Risk Profile and More!
>> http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3141/544a8a35684f3a352e09st04vuc
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com <javascript:;>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>