[CQ-Contest] Way back - ARRL log format -- suggestion for Cabrillo
David Pruett
k8cc at comcast.net
Thu Apr 9 01:08:26 EDT 2015
Yes, Goran this was incorporated a few years ago. The "QSO:" tag at the
beginning of the line is changed to "X-QSO:" to exclude the QSO from
checking.
This is documented clearly in the Cabrillo V3 spec on the WWROF web site at:
http://wwrof.org/cabrillo/cabrillo-specification-v3/
But there are other web sites claiming to have the V3 spec that do not
have the reference to "X-QSO:"
Dave/K8CC
On 4/8/2015 4:45 PM, Bokverket wrote:
> Personally, I think that there should be a way in Cabrillo to declare a
> contact as null, if you are not sure about the call or exchange. (Pardon me
> if this has been incorporated, I suggested it years ago but no positive
> reactions.) The reason is to avoid having the other station penalized for a
> non-existent contact if you delete the qso to avoid the same thing for
> yourself. Or is it forbidden these days to declare that you don't want
> credit for a contact?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Goran Fagerström
> SM0DRD
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list