[CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP?

W5GN w5gn at mxg.com
Sun Aug 2 07:05:05 EDT 2015


WRONG WRONG WRONG

By NOT sending in at least a CHECKLOG, you permit the WRONG serious
contester to win, because, in the absence of your CHECKLOG, stations
that made errors in copying your call/report/out-of-their-band
get a false credit for your QSO.

Please ALWAYS send in a log; at least as CHECKLOG, where your score 
won't be seen and where any "violation" of the contest rules by you
will have no impact.

73

Barry, W5GN



-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ken
Widelitz
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 2:03 PM
To: sawyered at earthlink.net; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] LY9W ? - time to ban SCP?

Hear, hear, Ed, N1UR.

 

Exactly. 

 

The only rules for anyone who wants to contest are the rules of the FCC or
other governmental authorities of their countries. Have fun in contests
doing anything you want under those rules. Only if you want to be considered
for an award by submitting your log to the sponsor do you have to follow the
sponsor's rules.

 

Really, you need only worry about your own skill development, not whether
others are developing their skills or not. And, really, are CW skills as
important today as the technology skills you learn from integrating remote
operating, skimmer, code readers, scp, etc. into your station? The only
people who can put up their hand and say yes are the hardcore CW contesters.
And hardcore CW contesters need the people who want to have fun with
whatever technology is available, regardless of how they copy your call.
Otherwise, CW contesting would always resemble Sunday afternoons in the
Sweepstakes.

 

73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list