[CQ-Contest] Logging question

[john at kk9a.com]

I am not sure how close his callsign was to the one you logged, but
logging mistakes are common. You could check QRZ.com to see if your logged
call is active or valid.  What is strange is that that he claims that you
have it incorrect two times out of three QSOs.  That is a high error rate.
 While running pileups many times I have heard a background station give
me a report while I am working someone else so it is possible that he was
not paying attention and you really did work someone else.  In either case
there is no reason for the insulting comments.

John KK9A



To:	Ktfrog007 at aol.com
Subject:	Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging question
From:	Jukka Klemola <jpklemola at gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:31:12 +0300

Hi Ken,
He simply asked me to correct his call in my log so he would get a
confirmation on LoTW.

73,
Jukka OH6LI


2015-08-04 4:15 GMT+03:00 <Ktfrog007 at aol.com>:

> What were the changes he requested?
>
> 73,
> Ken, AB1J
>
> In a message dated 2015-08-04 12:20:16 A.M. Coordinated Universal Ti,
> jpklemola at gmail.com writes:
>
> Fellow contesters,
>
> I got a request over email to change two of my recent logs.
> There was a 2by3 call sign asking me to change my log so he would get my
> LoTW confirmation for two QSOs.
> A third QSO was OK in our logs and 2by3 call was happy about that.
>
> My response was the QSOs happen over the air on the radio.
> Not on internet on email over internet, not at all after the contest.
>
> The 2by3 call was devastated that I had insulted him that I interprete he
> would try to make a QSO on the email. All he was asking me was to change my
> log .. on email and that happens now, some months after the contest.
>
> The 2by3 call was calling me by some names and was insulting.
>
>
> Can anyone tell me if I did anything right in my communication over email
> to the 2by3 callsign that the contest is over and my log will stay as it
> was logged when the contest was happening ?
>
> Or is there a possibility I did the right thing?
>
>
> I would have been happy to log him correctly, if he had corrected his call
> to me ..
>
>
> 73,
> Jukka OH6LI