[CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory

[Jeff Clarke]

Kelly, It's much more than just trying to gain an unfair advantage. Please reread the the first paragraph which contains words like "respect , fairness, ethics and fellowship". But the last one is the most important word - " sore loser "

JeffOn Dec 8, 2015 9:58 PM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt at mymts.net> wrote:
>
> One could argue poor sportsmanship is being displayed by those kvetching about their win, especially absent any facts. 
>
> A definition of poor sportsmanship in the link you provide is "…breaking the rules to gain an unfair advantage." 
>
> What rules have been broken and what's the "unfair advantage" of a lowly M2 station beating a MM? 
>
> 73 kelly 
> ve4xt 
>
>
> On 2015-12-08, at 6:33 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e at bellsouth.net> wrote: 
>
> > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sportsmanship 
> > 
> > It's pretty obvious to me the definition of sportsmanship is different in Europe is different than it is here in the United States. 
> > 
> > Read the above link and tell me if CR3L is being a good sport? 
> > 
> > This email thread has been nothing about anyone breaking any rules because it's pretty apparent to me that the rules are broken if they allow this to happen. 
> > 
> > Jeff 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > CQ-Contest mailing list 
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com 
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
>