[CQ-Contest] Classic M/S
Oliver Dröse
droese at necg.de
Thu Dec 10 17:55:14 EST 2015
Hi Ed,
> Sounds to me like there is a need for "Classic M/S". This could
> actually be an overlay from the M2 category I think.
I think it should be an overlay to the "normal" M/S.
> One run radio - running all the time and one "mult radio" doing
> whatever it can do. Its by default a M2 without lock out but you
> can't run on 2 radios. Only S & P the VFO or band map.
Isn't this what's already in "normal" M/S? Of course depending on
contest their might be additional limitations in "normal" M/S like
number of band changes which your definition doesn't have ... so making
it even more like "classic" M/2 than M/S.
But from what I understand what people want for "Classic M/S" is just
one radio. Period. No loopholes then concerning multiplier radio (or
several therof as the case today), just one single radio allowed.
Nothing else. That's it.
> I think it would quickly become a very popular category form
> the comments posted.
I think so, too. We are just a small group of 2-3 contesters locally and
with "Classic M/S" I could really imagine to do an multi OP. With the
current M/x categories we could never be competetive so rather run 2 (or
sometimes 3) single OP single band entries instead (which is fun, too).
73, Olli - DH8BQA
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list