[CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data
vk4ts at outlook.com
Tue Dec 22 13:38:41 EST 2015
Every change to a rule has an opposite reaction...
Offering USA multipliers to USA stations would mean you (USA) would concentrate on a clean sweep and not chase DX - we have enough trouble getting USA stations to point to VK in most contests without an added disincentive.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
TrentVK4TS PO Box 275 Mooloolaba 4557 0408497550
Please note I no longer use the WIA email address where possible owing to it blocking emails from sites such as VK Logger and ARRL.
> From: jamesdavidcain at gmail.com
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 16:22:46 +0000
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data
> >On Mon,12/21/2015 11:09 AM, kr2q at optimum.net wrote:
> >Remember, that there is an incentive for EU's to work each other on the low
> bands...to a much greater degree than for USA types to work each other (one zone and done).
> >>That's a PERFECT example of the problem with current contest scoring rules. 73, Jim K9YC
> Just imagine ... if the ARRL DX Contest counted U.S. states and Canadian provinces as multipliers for U.S. and Canadian participants. Even if the contacts counted only one point, or even zero points.
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest