[CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2
jamesdavidcain at gmail.com
Wed Dec 30 11:21:43 EST 2015
You commented about uniques but you attached my earlier comment about single-assisted.
----- Original Message -----
From: George Dubovsky
To: James Cain
Cc: CQ Contest
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Survey Results - part 2
I can recall more than one occasion when I had to coach a "casual" operator through a contest contact. That would be a good Q under anyone's interpretation of the rules. What if that was the only contest contact that fellow made? Why should I be penalized for taking the time and effort to get the Q?
geo - n4ua
On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 10:28 AM, James Cain <jamesdavidcain at gmail.com> wrote:
>"I don't believe that there is at least [he means 'even'] one casual operator who does not use clusters."
This is just so wrong as to be not even laughable. Thousands of contesters, from casuals like me to top competitors, log off, disconnect, and just play radio.
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest