[CQ-Contest] Uniques, Busted, Bads in CQWW
Stephen Bloom
sbloom at acsalaska.net
Thu Dec 31 12:31:46 EST 2015
I'd have to strongly disagree with this ...
That could be a serious penalty for those of us operating in semi or
genuinely rare entities. I know anytime I'm in a contest ...operating say
on 10M SSB ...if I'm spotted ..I'm going to get some folks who just want
Alaska on 10 ...the only deleted Qs should be for a non existent call sign.
We have to run under the assumption that people aren't cheating if/until we
know otherwise. If it is way out of kilter like UT5UGR .. then follow the
trail.
73
Steve KL7SB
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Olof Lundberg
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2015 2:30 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Uniques, Busted, Bads in CQWW
Just to add to Doug's excellent discussion of uniques: In Randy's survey I
ticked "Against" on the question re uniques. But then I started to look
deeper into the issue and I am now a convert - uniques should be deleted
(but not penalized) in most contests and certainly in CQWW.
As an example, at 3B8MU in 2014 we had only 0.7% uniques out of 10000+ QSOs
and this was at a semi-rare location. Looking at those uniques I am sure
that quite a few, maybe the majority, were busted calls. I would not be
worried about losing those "uniques" because statistically deletion of
uniques would hit the average player equally - there would be no change in
overall placement.
It would be interesting to see a global analysis of the ratio of uniques to
busted calls. I suspect that those with a high number of uniques also have a
high number of busted calls.
Now there are contests where deletion of uniques might not be appropriate. I
could think of contests with small participation and say 160m contests where
station capability and location is so critical.
There are already contests where uniques are disallowed. In 2014 I did a
relaxed entry in the LZ DX Contest as 3B9HA. There are loads of stations
that don't participate in the LZ Contest but want to work 3B9 so it turned
out that the sponsors only counted 764 of my 1115 QSOs. Fine, I believe I
understand why they do it but the net effect is of course that they
discourage participation by DX stations so in 2015 I stayed away from that
contest while at 3B9.
But in the big contests like the CQ WW and CQ WPX and most other big
contests - yes, just delete the uniques.
73 Olof G0CKV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list