[CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW

Milt -- N5IA n5ia at zia-connection.com
Thu Feb 26 22:09:26 EST 2015


I can see it now.

Being the remote controlled stations are at a disadvantage due to Internet 
latency, and will be in their separate category, I can see it already that a 
non-remote station will opt to submit its entry as 'remote controlled' and 
have the advantage in the results.  Who would know the difference?

With tongue in cheek.

Mis dos centavos.

Milt, N5IA

-----Original Message----- 
From: Ron Notarius W3WN
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 2:08 PM
To: pokane at ei5di.com ; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW


That said, I agree that, now that it's proven that it CAN be done for a M/S 
or M/M station, a rational discussion of whether or not there is or will be 
a need for a separate "remote controlled station" (or similar term) category 
is or will be necessary.


73, ron w3wn

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2015.0.5751 / Virus Database: 4299/9186 - Release Date: 02/26/15

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list