[CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW

[Pete Smith N4ZR]

30 or so years ago, that was the format, and I believe it is still 
specified in the reciprocal agreement between the US and Canada, but the 
rest of the world has moved on.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 2/27/2015 1:03 PM, Larry wrote:
> At one time the FCC requirement was  supposedly VE1RM/W1 but someone 
> cited the regs a while back saying that is no longer the required 
> form. Unfortunately, I don't recall where that discussion took place - 
> in one of the groups.
>
> 73, Larry  W6NWS
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Gerry Hull
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:04 PM
> To: Edward Sawyer
> Cc: CQ-Contest ; sm2ekm at bdtv.se
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] K4VV in ARRL DX CW
>
> Actually, not so Ed,
>
> VE1/W1VE or W1/VE1RM is the accepted international standard.   In the US
> and Canada, no authority is going to get bent out of shape if you do 
> it the
> other way around.
>
> Of course, I can't use either of these samples, because I'm licensed in
> each country.
>
> 73, Gerry W1VE & VE1RM
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Ed Sawyer <sawyered at earthlink.net> 
> wrote:
>
>> Actually, the reciprocal agreement between the US and Canada requires 
>> you
>> to
>> sign N1UR/VE2 not VE2/N1UR.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ed  N1UR
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>