[CQ-Contest] Logging Programs

[Tom Francis]

Joe,

Looking at that chart, it would appear that N1MM owns a huge portion
of the contesting software being used.  I don't believe that chart is truly
representative of either N1MM or N3FJP.  I know for my clubs, we changed
from N3FJP to N1MM+ because it was much easier to set up for multi-station
Q sorting and collation  - took me 3/4 of an hour to get all four 
stations set up
and ready to go for Field Day.  Last year, I never did get N3FJP 
networking to
work so have to do the sorting and collating by hand after.

Just my opinion, but I also found N1MM crew to be very easy to work with.
When we revamped the SC QSO Party, the John Bednarz was terrific getting
95% of what we wanted done done - and very quickly. The other 5% was
a pipe dream on our part and John pointed out why - very cooperative.

Tom, W1TEF

*THE BIG EVENT*
All New and Improved South Carolina QSO Party
September 19th, 2015 10 AM to 11 PM EDT.

Check it out - http://scqso.com/

On 6/28/2015 11:29 AM, Joe wrote:
> Now the question is, as i see stuff about contesting, everywhere, web 
> pages, facebook, news items, etc.. especially today with Field Day,
> And then after the WRTC contest was over most people used N1MM for 
> their logging.
> Like that page shows for CQWW 40% used N1MM,
> http://lu5dx.blogspot.de/2014/12/top-contest-loggers.html
> Now the odd thing is,, then why in all the sources of contest 
> coverage, news, web pages, magazines, facebook etc. when someone is 
> running a contest, all I ever see is the N3FJP Program, now it's a 
> great program and I have nothing against it. but it seems really odd 
> that if 40% use N1MM and only 3% use N3FJP, why is it that N3FJP all 
> you ever see being used?
>
> How Odd?
>
> Joe WB9SBD