[CQ-Contest] Logging Programs

[Martin , LU5DX]

The numbers you see in my web page are taken from the Cabrillo headers of
the logs received by CQ for the CQ WW DX Contests (2008-2012).
I'll try to include the 2013 and 2014 numbers asap.

73,

Martin LU5DX

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Peter Dougherty (W2IRT) <
contesting at w2irt.net> wrote:

> I don't really see widespread use of N1MM+ by the elite stations, at least
> in the unscientific survey of a few dozen I observed in articles, etc, from
> a few years ago. Writelog and Wintest are the two biggies when I factor in
> both DXpeditions and large contest stations. Look at the big DXpedition
> videos and it's rarely N1MM, which is a shame. Wintest seems to be the
> favourite for whatever reason.
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Regards,
> Peter Dougherty, W2IRT
> DXCC Card Checker/CQ-WAZ Checkpoint
>
> www.facebook.com/W2IRT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Joe
> Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 11:29 AM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Logging Programs
>
> Now the question is, as i see stuff about contesting, everywhere, web
> pages,
> facebook, news items, etc.. especially today with Field Day, And then after
> the WRTC contest was over most people used N1MM for their logging.
> Like that page shows for CQWW 40% used N1MM,
> http://lu5dx.blogspot.de/2014/12/top-contest-loggers.html
> Now the odd thing is,, then why in all the sources of contest coverage,
> news, web pages, magazines, facebook etc. when someone is running a
> contest,
> all I ever see is the N3FJP Program, now it's a great program and I have
> nothing against it. but it seems really odd that if 40% use N1MM and only
> 3%
> use N3FJP, why is it that N3FJP all you ever see being used?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>