[CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A.

[Kelly Taylor]

It appears at least one ham has some difficulty with English comprehension,
so I'd like to clarify: Nowhere does this post suggest Dmitry IGNORED
Randy's email. Just that it appears Dmitry didn't receive it.

73, kelly
ve4xt


On 5/8/15 8:36 AM, "ve4xt at mymts.net" <ve4xt at mymts.net> wrote:

> I was initially troubled by what appears to have been a perversion of the
> presumption of innocence, but in re-reading Randy's post, what's not seen are
> the initial attempts to contact UT5UGR.
> 
> That Randy apparently had trouble doing so certainly didn't help Dim. What was
> seen as unwillingness to respond probably weighed in on the decision. Too bad,
> because it certainly appears Dim would have had video of any problematic log
> entries: it's not as though his videos end with him turning off the camera.
> I'd guess the camera ran continuously.
> 
> There appears to be no evidence of wrongdoing in the posted videos, though one
> can't entirely discount the possibility that's by design, either.
> 
> If there's a lesson here, it's this: use only your everyday email address as
> the contact info on your log and find out the contest manager's email address
> and whitelist it. You don't want to miss any emails about your log.
> 
> I just hope this hasn't soured the WW milk for Dim. He looks like a great op
> and the competition would be diminished without him.
> 
> 73, Kelly
> ve4xt 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On May 8, 2015, at 7:20 AM, "Braco OE1EMS" <oe1ems at emssolutions.at> wrote:
>> 
>> Why are some operators allowed to be supermans and other not?
>> It will be interesting to see analysis of CC according to TO7A log!
>> 
>> I saw, not only in ham radio contesting many YL or OM they just doing great
>> and moving borders
>> always  far away from what we are thinking it´s possible!
>> 
>> I don¹t protect anyone or blaming CC for their decisions, but as we know
>> there numbers of
>> of wrong jury decision even in professional sports. Sometimes they
>> penalized, sometimes
>> they not seeing failures....that´s life!
>> 
>> If someone is different or better it doesn´t mean he is cheating ....of
>> course it can be,
>> but before you make your own decision about it, maybe consider more things
>> even if CC did made already DQ!
>> 
>> It´s was pleasure to lsn that TO7A recording Peter send to reflector!
>> 
>> Can you do it like that or better?!
>> 
>> I doesn´t mean that Dimitry didn¹t take some advantage of some assistance...
>> maybe or maybe not .....it´s not my job to judge about it!
>> I just can have my own opinion based on real facts which I don¹t have!
>> 
>> 
>> 73s
>> Braco
>> E77DX
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] Im Auftrag von
>> Yuri VE3XB
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 08. Mai 2015 01:53
>> An: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Betreff: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A.
>> 
>> Steve,
>> 
>> Believable or not is really, really strong argument...
>> 
>> Your rates compare to those of mine are unbelievable.
>> 
>> And there is one guy who says that my rates compare to his are hard to
>> believe.
>> 
>> 73 Yuri VE3XB
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> 
>> Quit bellyaching. Download and study Dimitry's log yourself. Draw your own
>> conclusions.
>> 
>> Are his rates believable ?
>> 
>> Steve, N2IC
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing
> list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq
> -contest