[CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A.

Sun May 10 17:48:55 EDT 2015

I didn't provide an answer on the below-cited examples as it would take 
an entire log to review excerpts.

That is like asking whether $5.50 a liter for snozzwanger juice is too 
high or too low....If there is no context, how could anyone provide an 
educated guess.

73 Rich NN3W

On 5/9/2015 5:13 AM, Dmitry Stashuk wrote:
> Hi, Rich.
> I don't have entire contest record. I did make dual CQ record at Randy's K5ZD personal request. Hi did ask me exactly about. To record all the contest I need an extra computer with at least 500gb hdd or more which not so easy to bring with me to overseas. If rules will require this, I will do.
> Actually you didn't say something on examples below. Can you scan up to 30 khz in 2-3 minutes and find few mults on overcrowded band as in this examples?
>
> 73's Dim UT5UGR
>
>
>
> -------- Исходное сообщение --------
> От: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w at verizon.net>
> Дата:09.05.2015  0:58  (GMT+02:00)
> Кому: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Тема: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A.
>
> Well given that a log analysis was done based on the totality of a log,
> there is no way to judge a log excerpt in isolation.
>
> How about this, why don't you post the entire 48 hour video of your
> effort and we will then be able to decide without question.  Seem
> reasonable?
>
> 73 Rich NN3W
>
> On 5/8/2015 4:52 PM, Dmitry Stashuk wrote:
>> Hi, Rich.
>> Just one question to you as you are S&P   expert. Can you examine this log frames to check either assisted or not this entries.
>> 7015 0913 LA6IHA
>> 3521 0914 VP2V/DL7VOG
>> 7015 0914 YL2PA
>> 3529 0915 YS4U
>> 3542 0916 VA7KO
>> 3527 0917 8P5A
>>
>> 3522 0908 JA3YBK
>> 3554 0909 PV8DX
>>
>> 14070 1733 ON6BR
>> 28040 1734 VP2E
>> 14070 1735 K3OSO
>> 28043 1735 PY1NB
>> 28022 1736 8P5A
>> 28019 1737 P49Y
>> 14070 1738 OL9Z
>>
>> 14002 2324 TI5A
>> 14016 2325 LT1F
>> 14032 2327 P40A
>>
>> More frames are available if you are interesting.
>>
>> Just please submit your opinion.
>>
>> 73's Dim UT5UGR
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Исходное сообщение --------
>> От: Richard F DiDonna NN3W <richnn3w at verizon.net>
>> Дата:08.05.2015  17:27  (GMT+02:00)
>> Кому: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Тема: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CW 2014 TO7A.
>>
>> I'm not going to make any presumptions, but I noted many of the same
>> issues that Ken saw.  Some very LARGE VFO swings in a matter of one or
>> two minutes - and only hitting multipliers on the other radio. Having
>> done a lot of S&P work, I have difficulty making a 30 KHz swing in two
>> minutes on CW - and hitting multipliers as the only QSOs.
>>
>> 73 Rich NN3W
>>
>> On 5/7/2015 6:38 PM, Ken Widelitz wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> I've looked fairly carefully at the TO7A log.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> The operator is expertly interweaving QSOs using dueling CQs on two bands
>>> almost the entire contest. There are a few short successful mult passes
>>> where there appears to be no CQing. There are some instances of very juicy
>>> mults appearing over fairly large swaths of frequencies in short time
>>> periods that do raise questions. There are other periods that I feel don't
>>> quite fall into that category, but others might have a differing opinion. I
>>> have enumerated the ones I find might have drawn the attention of the CQWW
>>> Committee and influenced their decision to issue a DQ.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:  What I view as potentially questionable does not
>>> equate to DEFINITIVE evidence of assistance. It could be the results of a
>>> great operator.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> At 0708 - 0710 there are three mults on 80m while running high rate on
>>> another band.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> At 0727 - 0740 there are a lot of mults on 40m while running high rate on
>>> another band.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> At 0934 - 0938 there are a couple of mults while running high rate on
>>> another band.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> At 1013 - 1014 there are two mults on 15m 26 khz apart that make you wonder
>>> if you can tune that fast in S&P, but it is early and there aren't many
>>> signals on the band. Maybe it was professional use of a bandscope.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> At 1403 - 1411 there are 7 mults on 10m stretched over 50 khz. Tuning 50 khz
>>> while working 7 QSOs on the run frequency in 9 minutes is impressive. Maybe
>>> it was professional use of a bandscope.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> At 1847 - 1850 there are 3 mults on 10m over 30 khz while running on 15m.
>>> Maybe it was professional use of a bandscope.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> At 0903 - 0913 there is an instance of jumping off a 40m CQ frequency,
>>> working a mult 12 khz away and jumping back to the CQ frequency within 3
>>> minutes while working an additional 3 mults on 80m.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> Again, these are simply my observations. As Steve, N2IC stated, you view the
>>> log and draw your own conclusions.
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>>       
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest