[CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle

Gerry Hull gerry at yccc.org
Tue May 12 15:22:09 EDT 2015


Sunshine is the best remedy.  The single best act Randy has done is making
the logs public.
Now, crowd sourcing of log review is a pretty simple effort.

SDR + RBN + crowdsourcing: pretty much no way to hide this type of cheating.

73,

Gerry W1VE


On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Roberts, Will <
Will.Roberts at duke-energy.com> wrote:

> If someone was feeding calls to TO7A to try and have him disqualified,
> wouldn't these have likely been picked up by an SDR somewhere? As I recall
> reading in these posts, there were no SDR records found for these QSOs.
> This is probably the main evidence that Randy and the CQ committee used to
> prove the cheating.
>
> 73,
>
> Will AA4NC
>
>
>
>
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:39:19 +0100
>
> From: "Stewart GM4AFF" <stewart at gm4aff.net<mailto:stewart at gm4aff.net>>
>
> To: "'CQ-Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest at contesting.com<mailto:
> cq-contest at contesting.com>>
>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] TO7A debacle
>
> Message-ID: <000e01d08bf8$43e5ac60$cbb10520$@gm4aff.net<mailto:
> 000e01d08bf8$43e5ac60$cbb10520$@gm4aff.net>>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
>
>
> Could be that someone is trying to stitch up Dimitri by feeding the calls.
>
> We have seen this before.
>
>
>
> Stewart
>
> GM4AFF
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list