[CQ-Contest] Proposed rule changes
Steve London
n2icarrl at gmail.com
Fri May 22 15:52:09 EDT 2015
On 05/22/2015 11:04 AM, Dennis McAlpine wrote:
> 3) Changing of log after a QSO is completed - I fear this restriction
> is overkill. To require a recording of the contest but then saying you
> can't use it to correct a log seems a bit ridiculous. This assumes that
> someone (certainly not me) is devoted enough to go back and
> listen to the whole log just to pick up a few changes. But, this is an
> extreme case. What about realizing that the guy who sent you "V44HS" meant
> to send "V44HH" but you don't pick up the error until you have worked V44HH,
> not V44HS, on three other bands. Is it cheating to make that change "after
> the QSO is completed"? What about the fat fingered typo that you don't see
> until you print out a list of QSOs and see that V44HHH is really V44HH?
> What about the case where the op on the mult rig yells out "That was V44HH,
> not V44HS" but you have just hit Enter? How much log massaging can one do
> in the time allowed being the end of the contest and log submission? Don't
> we allow the use of SuperCheckPartial before the QSO is completed? What if
> one's PC is slow and you don't get the answer until after hitting enter?
> Why not just prohibit "extensive" log editing and leave the definition up to
> the committee?
Rule IX, 10. would not allow you to change that V44HS QSO to V44HH
later. This is not a new rule.
"Call signs logged must be the same as those exchanged over the air by
the entrants during the QSO."
73,
Steve, N2IC
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list