[CQ-Contest] CQWW - Proposed rule changes.

[Steve Lott]

so any visual tools should place one in assisted !!!!???

what about band scopes,  now no one can use a pan adapter  or icom 756pro2
, 3 etc ????

you said visual

cheers!
steve


http://www.KG5VK.com
My Ham Radio Friends


On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:53 PM, David Gilbert <xdavid at cis-broadband.com>
wrote:

>
>
> It always amazes me how people can be so declarative about "the way it
> is", and so narrowly interpretive of it, when expressing their own personal
> views.
>
> For example, if I happen to read/decode CW off a waterfall display with no
> other decoding I'm pretty certain that does not put me in an assisted
> category ... but then, at least I'm willing to express that as opinion and
> not fact.
>
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
>
> On 5/23/2015 9:42 PM, brian coyne wrote:
>
>>            -
>>        -
>>
>>          -
>>
>>    I am really puzzled and exasperated by this continued debate as to
>> what constitutes assistance. What is there not to understand?
>> Let's get back to basics. Our hobby is ham radio, radio being the
>> operative word. Radio, cw or voice, is an audio mode, not in any way a
>> visual mode, we detect it by hearing and information acquired in any other
>> way is assistance - end of.
>> If guys use any other means of gathering information, including cw
>> decoders, then what is the big deal why they should not enter the
>> 'Assisted' category?  Beats me.
>> 73  Brian  C4Z / 5B4AIZ.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>