[CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015

[Barry]

It's a question of pragmatism.  That is, when the operations are sight 
unseen (unlike WRTC and HST), there's a limit to what can be enforced 
and what can't.

On a side note, there was a DQ from HST a number of years ago when I 
competitor from Belarus was found to have a CW "slower downer" built 
into his headphones.  After that, the rules were changed - headphones 
supplied by the organizers.

Barry W2UP

On 5/24/2015 14:48, Stan Stockton wrote:
> No, Barry.  It's drawing a line to preserve some semblance of skill required to work a CW Contest.  Using your thinking, I see no reason to disallow CW Readers in High Speed CW Competitions.
>
> Stan, K5GO
>
> Sent from Stan's IPhone
>
>
>
>> On May 24, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Barry <w2up at comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>> I believe the likelihood of this is up there with the argument to preserve paper logs and dupe sheets.  Time and technology continue, and we adapt to the changes.
>>
>> Barry W2UP
>>
>>> On 5/24/2015 10:59, Stan Stockton wrote:
>>> If nothing else good comes of the TO7A operation, perhaps a renewed interest to preserve SOAB instead of eliminating it will be the result. That's a good thing.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>