[CQ-Contest] CQWW Proposed Rules

Christian Schneider prickler.schneider at t-online.de
Tue May 26 18:54:04 EDT 2015


Some random points remaining from the discussions here.

Given the big interest to do nearly everything to detect cheaters I hope 
this will still be in minds during the next discussion about faster 
turnaround of results "to make contesting more attractive". Time 
pressure and fixed deadlines are the least helpful things for 
volounteers chasing cheating regardless what seemingly powerful tools 
they may have - and something like SDR-recordings increase precision but 
are a bottomless abyss where you can easily drown timewise (audio 
recordings being potentially the same beasts).

Somewhat unbelievable faith in software - as it could be written, 
implemented and used as easily as we nearly never experience in real 
life projects...

Segregating between competitors and participants is the more difficult 
when we want to foster competetive operating on all levels and be it 
during a three hour race via online-scoreboard between some very 
parttime operators or when we want to foster regional competition from 
lower score areas not allowing for TopTen. And it may have good 
"educational" effect to find and sanction cheating also in early stages 
of contester's careers. It may be too late when someone grew to an op as 
good in cheating as in operating and only then being tackled by nasty 
logcheckers.
And a somewhat formal distinction between both groups could take out the 
motivation and emotions associated with the underdog effect from real 
sports - not necessarily with winning (even if at least EU football fans 
will remember the unbelievable story of OZ "holiday team" beating DL for 
the EU title 1992...) but "unexpected" rank 10 should be possible even 
without preregistering (and recording and...) as aspirant for this 
achivement.

We circle around the very uncomfortable point that with all our efforts 
we will land behind "real sports" with real on site inspections, but may 
at least find some consolation in the fact that even real life cops can 
not find all bad boys - which were only possible by means making things 
and life much worse (do we really want sponsor certified wattmeter-boxes 
transmitting values to a central server or DQing someone when his live 
video transmission interrupts in hour 37 or his cam suddenly misses the 
view to instrument reading XY?).

Cu&73 Chris DL8MBS


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list