[CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications

[4O3A]

Hi Martin,

Your opinion has some logic, indeed.

Respecting different opinions, I just want to ask German friends to 
reconsider and discuss sensitive and important part of rules. That's 
all, and their decision in anyhow final.


73
Ranko




On 5/29/2015 12:13 AM, Martin , LU5DX wrote:
> I don't think anything's flawed.
> WRTC is about top contesters.
> You cannot prove you are a top contester if you are part of a crew.
> You can only prove you are a top contester by being succesful in SOAB 
> categories.
>
> That's totally separated from the competition mode adopted by each 
> WRTC: MS or M2 or whatever.
>
> Those who have proved they are good in SOAB will also have to prove 
> they are good when it comes to team work.
>
> It doesn't work the other way around.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Martin LU5DX
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:21 PM, VK4TS Trent Sampson 
> <vk4ts at outlook.com <mailto:vk4ts at outlook.com>> wrote:
>
>     Agreed Ranko,
>
>     A scoring system that favours Single ops to compete in a Multi Op
>     contest
>     (WRTC) and disadvantages those who operate Multi Ops obviously has
>     major
>     flaws -
>
>     Considering the format was  M2 from the last WRTC it is even
>     further flawed.
>
>
>     Regards
>
>     Trent VK4TS
>
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
>     <mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com>] On Behalf Of
>     4O3A
>     Sent: Friday, 29 May 2015 2:13 AM
>     To: cq-contest at contesting.com <mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com>
>     Subject: [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2018 qualifications
>
>     Once more I would like to ask our German friends to reconsider two
>     important
>     parts of rules:
>
>     1.    Qualification period. It is really too short. Needless to repeat
>     reasons why it should be longer.
>     2.    Weight for categories - to correct MS weight from 0.9 to 1.0, as
>     it was earlier. As majority of active contest stations will try to
>     qualify
>     for WRTC, this will "disqualify" MS  for next two years. If it
>     won't be
>     changed, or WRTC qualification  or MS participation in next two
>     years must
>     be sacrificed.
>
>     I know it is hard/impossible to make everything to be ideal, and
>     will not
>     impress my personal opinion about other details I disagree, but
>     those two
>     are "infrastructural" :-)
>
>     73
>     Ranko
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CQ-Contest mailing list
>     CQ-Contest at contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
>     http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     CQ-Contest mailing list
>     CQ-Contest at contesting.com <mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
>     http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 2014.0.4800 / Virus Database: 4311/9888 - Release Date: 05/28/15
>