[CQ-Contest] When do we spot? Should it be required?

[Joe]

I like the idea of the logging program control, somewhat like a pain 
killer drip thing.

You can choose when to make it make a post. But then there is a timer 
that it won't do another for "X" amount of time. This way you have some 
control when it happens like if you have a great frequency and a great 
run going,  don't spot.  but once it slows down too much you can do one.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 10/28/2015 6:00 PM, Martin Pelt wrote:
> Thats a great idea.  Skimmer has equaled competition in cw.
>
> Martin N4UU
> On Oct 28, 2015 1:06 PM, "RT Clay" <rt_clay at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 9:28 AM, Maarten van Rossum <
>> pd2r.maarten at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> If you send your call in CW you get a spot right away. It is virtually
>> the
>>> same as self spotting. So, why not allow self spotting for SSB?
>>
>> What about sending a CW ID or CQ periodically in addition to a voice CQ
>> during phone contests? Then CW Skimmer would spot you (the default band
>> limits in Skimmer might need modifying).
>>
>>
>> Tor
>> N4OGW
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>