[CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net

[Stephen Bloom]

Vlad:

See ..now that is something I've found valuable here.  I started out pretty skeptical about the need for Unassisted ..some of the comments here have convinced me that it is worth keeping and should be encouraged ..you know the drill ..when you put something out into the ip world or the rf world ..you never know who might hear you :)

73
Steve KL7SB


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of V Sidarau
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 11:31 AM
To: 'Radio K0HB' <kzerohb at gmail.com>; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net

Hans, 

 

Haven’t you noticed a (bitter) grain of irony behind my statement? If not, sorry, I made the grain too small. 

 

If I ever show up in this list, I do it to protect the SO group as Is and trying to prevent it from merging with Assisted. Unfortunately there is a clear trend towards the merge. Hence the bitter-ironic “outdated”.

 

73,

 

Vlad VE3IAE

 

--

 

From: Radio K0HB [mailto:kzerohb at gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 2:45 PM
To: V Sidarau; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: cqcontest.net

 

Vladimir wrote:

> .....outdated "Boy and His Radio"

I resemble that remark. 

Except the "outdated" appellation.

I don't trash your chosen category. Why is it necessary to denigrate those preferences don't match yours? 




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest