[CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net

[Rudy Bakalov]

One would argue the cluster helps you maximize the use of the second radio by quickly identifying mults.

Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect.


> On Apr 5, 2016, at 9:54 AM, "john at kk9a.com" <john at kk9a.com> wrote:
> 
> I hope that this does not happen. The CQ WPX RTTY contest also has no
> unassisted category.  This pushes operators to use the cluster to be
> competitive instead of using their SO2R S&P skills.
> 
> John KK9A
> 
> 
> To:    <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject:    Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
> From:    "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd at charter.net>
> Reply-to:    k5zd at charter.net
> Date:    Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:07:34 -0000
> 
> There is another option...  Rather than continue to get twisted in defining
> the separation, we could merge SO and SOA into one and remove all confusion.
> There could be an overlay category for the guys who want to compare
> themselves to other "classic" ops.
> 
> It seems only CQ, ARRL, and SAC maintain the assisted concept.  The rest of
> the world has moved on.
> 
> Randy, K5ZD
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest