[CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net

[KU7Y]

You're not the only one who feels that way Tony,

I've said for a long time that SO1R and SO2R should be separate classes.

OK, back in my hole,

Ron, KU7Y
Arizona Outlaws Contest Club
Northern California Contest Club
Silver Springs, NV
ku7y at qsl.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> N2TK, Tony
> Sent: Tuesday, April 5, 2016 3:20 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
> 
> For my own selfish reasons I would like to see SO1R and SO2R Unassisted
> separate.
> 
> 73,
> N2TK, Tony
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Ed
> Sawyer
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 1:19 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
> 
> Ditto the KD4D post.
> 
> 
> 
> Why don't we let the unassisted operators decide whether the concern of
> assisted ops invading our category is worth eliminating it over the
concern?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No reason to merge the 2 categories and then do an overlay.  Just leave it
> the way it is and clarify reasonable questions like Braco's question.
> 
> 
> 
> By the way, do to great efforts of the organizations and contest managers,
> doesn't the ARRL and CQ contests represent something like 75%+ of all the
> contest Qs made in a year?  Why exactly should this majority follow the
> "rest of the world" minority?  Just sayin.
> 
> 
> 
> Ed  N1UR
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest