[CQ-Contest] Should I sign portable zero in WAE next weekend?
V Sidarau
vs_otw at rogers.com
Mon Aug 8 11:34:30 EDT 2016
Barry,
Concerning the LoTW part.
W2UP and W2UP/0 are different call-signs. If you go for W2UP/0, definitely
there will not be any LoTW match if you upload your QSOs as W2UP.
1. Provided, you are a LoTW user, you can get an extra LoTW certificate for
any additional call-sign (W2UP/0 in this particular case) you use from the
same DXCC entity. Preparing and processing a so-called signed certificate
request takes just a few minutes or hours, worst case.
2. You can merge W2UP and W2UP/0 logs in LoTW. As a result, since W2UP is a
main account holder, W2UP/0 QSOs will also count for W2UP scores. Therefore
your DXCC and other accounts will not suffer from using another call-sign.
73,
Vlad VE3IAE
--
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Barry
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 8:17 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Should I sign portable zero in WAE next weekend?
I plan on playing around in WAE next weekend - nothing serious as working
Europe from Colorado is too depressing.
In the contest, each US call area is a mult. My question is: Should I sign
W2UP or W2UP/0?
Pros: 0's are less common than 2's as heard in Europe, so maybe some
stations will seek me out.
It will explain my weak signal.
Cons: It's a longer callsign.
It will mess up my LOTW and clublog submission, as there will
be a mismatch if I submit under W2UP (correct?)
Barry W2UP(/0)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list