[CQ-Contest] CR3OO, ZF2MJ - "what" are they doing?

[Barry]

I like Jose's nomenclature.  Why?  Because if mere mortals do this for 
anything length of time, you are going "2 B sick."

Barry W2UP

On 12/2/2016 08:17, Filipe Lopes wrote:
> You can also call it ALTERNATE CQ :) or as Jose says 2BSIQ :)
>
>
>
>
> 73's Filipe Lopes
> CT1ILT - CR6K
> F4VPX - TM3M
>
> 2016-12-02 14:46 GMT+01:00 <kr2q at optimum.net>:
>
>> OK, this is driving me nuts.  The wrong terminology is being used here.
>>
>> They are NOT dual CQing.  That would be a violation of the rules.
>>
>> DUAL CQing would mean they are CQing at the same time.
>>
>> Think about "DUAL citizenship"
>> Think about "DUAL universes"
>> Think about "DUAL responsibility"
>> Think about "DUAL ownership"
>>
>> All of these signify "at the same time."
>>
>> The correct term for what OO and MJ (and NT and others) are doing is called
>> DUELING CQs.
>>
>> First, rig 1 calls CQ (or test or dit-dit), THEN (not at the same time)
>> rig 2 calls CQ.
>>
>> They go back and forth, as in a DUEL
>>
>> Think about Olympic fencing
>> Parry then Riposte
>>
>> OK, no idea if anyone cares about this but me, but I feel better now.
>>
>> Thanks for the bandwidth.
>>
>> de Doug KR2Q
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus