[CQ-Contest] Operating in Mexico
Rick Lindquist, WW1ME
ww1me at roadrunner.com
Mon Dec 26 10:02:27 EST 2016
Please see
http://www.arrl.org/news/mexico-not-yet-extending-operating-permission-to-no
n-mexican-radio-amateurs
This is the most recent information ARRL has (as of 12-14-2016) regarding
operation from Mexico by non-Mexican licensees and the regulatory situation
there. COFETEL was replaced by another entity, IFT, back in 2013.
Rick, WW1ME
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
cq-contest-request at contesting.com
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2016 12:00 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 168, Issue 70
Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
cq-contest at contesting.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cq-contest-request at contesting.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
cq-contest-owner at contesting.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Stew Perry Logs (Tree)
2. Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted entrants
(kr2q at optimum.net)
3. CQ 160 database - HELP WANTED (Randy Thompson K5ZD)
4. Re: Stew Perry Logs (Jim Brown)
5. Re: Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted entrants
(Paul O'Kane)
6. Re: Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted entrants
(Ria Jairam)
7. Re: Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted entrants
(john at kk9a.com)
8. Snarky comment re:Dec 24 CQWW Blog (Art Boyars)
9. Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted entrants
(ko7ss at yahoo.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:51:55 -0800
From: Tree <tree at kkn.net>
To: 160 <topband at contesting.com>, "cq-contest at contesting.com"
<cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry Logs
Message-ID:
<CAKF9HhaQKnqpnB-7xfAdyKQs_U2JYjj+bRPAf0JZj3CqncMOZg at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Just a reminder to send in your Stew Perry log - especially if you were a
low power or QRP station. By sending in your log - you will assure that the
people you worked get the appropriate multiplier for their hard earned QSO
with you.
We are close to a record number of log submissions already - just a week
after the contest.
www.kkn.net/stew
73 and Happy Holidays
Tree N6TR
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 21:33:25 GMT
From: <kr2q at optimum.net>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com,
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted
entrants
Message-ID: <e93b832e68be.585ee9a5 at optonline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Please feel free to check it out
http://cqww.com/blog/
No innuendo, just some numbers which you may find interesting (or not).
de Doug KR2Q
On behalf of the CQWW Contest committee
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 00:25:56 -0000
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd at charter.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CQ 160 database - HELP WANTED
Message-ID: <018301d25e45$758b3f20$60a1bd60$@charter.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
When it is cold and dark one can't help but think about 160 meters.
Especially the CQ 160 contest at the end of January (CW) and February (SSB).
We are working on building out a database of CQ 160 Meter contest scores.
The CQ 160 scores from 2004-2016 are now available in a searchable database
on the cq160.com web site.
>From here on, progress requires typing in the results from the magazine
results.
There are still many more years to go. If you would like to take on the job
of typing in a year, please let me know.
Everyone enjoys the CQ WW and CQ WPX score databases. Let's do the same for
the 160m contest.
73
Randy, K5ZD
PS - View all scores: http://www.cq160.com/scores.htm
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:21:17 -0800
From: Jim Brown <k9yc at audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Stew Perry Logs
Message-ID:
<39614e4c-3c76-710a-3d9f-c4e22916bde7 at audiosystemsgroup.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On Sat,12/24/2016 10:51 AM, Tree wrote:
> We are close to a record number of log submissions already
The JT9 and JT65 windows have been jumping this winter. I've been monitoring
for about a month, in hopes of working SC and VT to complete QRP WAS on 160.
I was successful a few weeks ago in completing a QSO with WV. From my QTH 5
miles from the Pacific, 70 miles S of San Francisco, I've decoded 530
different stations, and they were working another 30-40 stations I could not
decode. On any given night, it's common to decode at least 50 different
stations. At least a third of the stations are east of the Mississippi
River. Four were from EU, two from VK (including VK6, 8,000 miles mostly
over water) and a few SA. Nearly all states and most Canadian provinces have
been represented; the only US states not decoded are HI and VT.
The comparison with CW activity is stark -- my P3 display rarely shows more
than one or two signals on the band at any one time, and when I tune to
them, it's often an unanswered CQ.
73, Jim K9YC
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 23:42:18 +0000
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane at ei5di.com>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted
entrants
Message-ID: <585F07DA.7010405 at ei5di.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Thanks - any chance of deriving similar figures for SO LP?
And if there really is to be no innuendo, then graphs that go from zero to
100% (rather than 70%) might be visually more representative.
73,
Paul EI5DI
On 24/12/2016 21:33, kr2q at optimum.net wrote:
> Please feel free to check it out
> http://cqww.com/blog/
>
> No innuendo, just some numbers which you may find interesting (or not).
>
> de Doug KR2Q
> On behalf of the CQWW Contest committee
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 00:03:49 +0000
From: Ria Jairam <rjairam at gmail.com>
To: cq-contest at contesting.com, kr2q at optimum.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted
entrants
Message-ID:
<CAMCyBs56D8RCWboErK_HVos-MnmixUT0uGaCeTqG7XZn98gjgA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Curious how it relates to overall participation.
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 5:19 PM <kr2q at optimum.net> wrote:
> Please feel free to check it out
>
> http://cqww.com/blog/
>
>
>
> No innuendo, just some numbers which you may find interesting (or not).
>
>
>
> de Doug KR2Q
>
> On behalf of the CQWW Contest committee
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> CQ-Contest mailing list
>
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 19:36:40 -0500
From: <john at kk9a.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted
entrants
Message-ID: <002501d25e46$f60fadb0$e22f0910$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Here are some numbers from the 2016 CQWW CW contest that are interesting:
Single-Op High All Bands
ZF2MJ.........14,929,938 (N6MJ)
CR3OO.........14,112,630 (CT1BOH)
TI5W..........14,043,125 (KL9A)
V47T..........12,288,155 (N2NT)
8P5A..........12,260,640 (W2SC)
9Y4/VE3EY......9,709,926
EF8U...........9,611,171 (OZ1AA)
NP4DX..........9,442,162 (VE3DZ)
CR6K...........9,096,178 (CT1ILT)
YW4D...........8,714,552 (YV1DIG)
Assisted High All Bands
P40C...........8,955,850 (KU1CW)
LP1H...........8,729,994 (LU5DX)
6Y9X...........8,019,525 (K1XM)
HI3CC..........7,227,480 (NP4Z)
SN7Q...........6,324,480 (SP7GIQ)
K5ZD/1.........6,269,328
UB7K...........5,823,370
K0DQ/1.........5,780,222 (K0DQ)
K1ZZ...........5,538,101
S57AL..........5,440,534
To: cq-contest at contesting.com,
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted
entrants
From: <kr2q at optimum.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 21:33:25 GMT
Please feel free to check it out
http://cqww.com/blog/
No innuendo, just some numbers which you may find interesting (or not).
de Doug KR2Q
On behalf of the CQWW Contest committee
_________________________________________
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 22:26:52 -0500
From: Art Boyars <artboyars at gmail.com>
To: CQ-Contest Reflector <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Snarky comment re:Dec 24 CQWW Blog
Message-ID:
<CAJFNq0H+u-+rYG5qhMRMaGBBs1Sg+2z0QHJLE2V54UChoq24aA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Well, of course -- it was for SSB. People who operate 'phone instead of
learning the code are lazy, just like click-heads who don't want to tune for
QSOs. I'd expect a strong correlation.
Now don't start flaming me. I said it was snarky, and it was (mostly) in
jest. Some human activities may be easier to start up ('phone, rather than
CW; SO, rather than SOA; snare drum, rather than violin), but excellence
always takes a lot of effort, and, sometimes, unusual talents.
73, Art K3KU
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:10:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: <ko7ss at yahoo.com>
To: "CQ-contest at contesting.com" <CQ-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dec 24 CQWW Blog: Trending SOABHP assisted
entrants
Message-ID: <2089506576.1646477.1482646211995 at mail.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
So 65 % of CQCWWSSB NA entrants are unlimited. Hmmm....
More interesting will be the CQWWCW. With the firehose of CW RBN spots, more
people have access to more contacts. More contacts is always more fun. The
vast majority of W/K CW entrants have minmimal ability to "run" stations.
The question then becomes, do you want to S&P the band yourself or click on
spots with the occasional try at a CQ? The stats will answer which choice is
more popular
73, Bill KO7SS
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
------------------------------
End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 168, Issue 70
*******************************************
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list